A Comparison Standard for Assessing the Adapted Version of the Brazilian Functionality Index

Authors

  • Edgar Merchan-Hamann Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde – Universidade de Brasilia - Brasília – Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6775-9466
  • Heleno Rodrigues Correa Filho Universidade do Distrito Federal (UnDF), Escola Superior de Ciências da Saúde (ESCS) – Brasília (DF), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8056-8824
  • Éverton Luís Pereira Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Departamento de Saúde Coletiva (DSC) – Brasília (DF), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7771-1594
  • Livia Barbosa Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Instituto de Ciências Humanas (ICH), Departamento de Serviço Social – Brasília (DF), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2268-3212
  • Daniela da Silva Rodrigues Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Departamento de Saúde Coletiva (DSC) – Brasília (DF), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7391-1794
  • William Rosa Souza Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Departamento de Saúde Coletiva (DSC) – Brasília (DF), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8915-4895
  • Maria da Graça Luderitz Höefel Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Departamento de Saúde Coletiva (DSC) – Brasília (DF), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2176-5013
  • Gladston Luiz da Silva Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Departamento de Estatística (EST) – Brasília (DF), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9650-2993

Keywords:

Social welfare, Disability evaluation, Disability studies, Retirement, Observer variation

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the best method of achieving consensus between examiners and workers with disabilities
in Brazil regarding their perceived severity of the disability and eligibility for an early retirement pension. We analyzed the agreement among evaluators’ perceptions to create a reference standard for the classification of the disability severity of applicant workers with disabilities. Pairs of expert physicians and social workers applied a computer index and then assigned their perceived level of severity, independent of the computer classification. The analysis included 17,350 applicants aged 18 to 76 years. The best-perceived agreement represented the ideal comparison standard for validating the index. The severity perceptions of the evaluators and the workers with disabilities yielded agreement tables portraying the perceived disability severity. Physicians and social workers demonstrated the most significant level of agreement (weighted kappa: 0.2351, 95% confidence interval: 0.2229–0.2473), and the combination of their assessments provided the best standard. From what it appears, this is the first time that this method has been used to create a reference standard. Evaluators’ perceptions of disability severity formed the basis for choosing a standard to further analyze the index’s accuracy and validity.

Published

2026-10-08

How to Cite

1.
Merchan-Hamann E, Correa Filho HR, Pereira Éverton L, Barbosa L, Rodrigues D da S, Souza WR, et al. A Comparison Standard for Assessing the Adapted Version of the Brazilian Functionality Index. Saúde Debate [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 8 [cited 2026 Oct. 9];50(151 out-dez). Available from: https://revista.saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/10871

Data statement

Research data

Correa Filho, Heleno Rodrigues; Merchan-Hamann, Edgar; Souza, William Rosa; Barbosa, Lívia; Pereira, Éverton Luís; Rodrigues, Daniela da Silva; Höefel, Maria da Graça Luderitz; Silva, Gladston Luiz da, 2026, "Dados de replicação para: DOIS Um Padrão de Comparação para Avaliação da Versão Adaptada do Índice Brasileiro de Funcionalidade", https://doi.org/10.48331/SCIELODATA.NJ2BU4, SciELO Data, V5